Extract Ratios and Standardisation Explained

What follows is what the evidence actually supports, and where it stops.

What this actually means

A 10:1 extract means ten parts raw herb produced one part extract, while standardisation specifies the percentage of a named active compound the extract contains. That definition matters because the term gets used loosely in supplement marketing, where a real mechanism is routinely stretched into a promise the evidence does not carry.

Without understanding both, it is impossible to compare two botanical products or to judge whether an amount is meaningful.

Why it matters if you are buying a supplement

Almost every purchase decision in this category comes down to one question: is the product addressing the actual cause of the problem you have? Appetite, sleep debt, an energy surplus, insulin resistance and simple measurement error all produce similar-looking frustration, and they need different responses. Getting the cause right is worth more than getting the product right.

Without understanding both, it is impossible to compare two botanical products or to judge whether an amount is meaningful. That is why the sequence on this site is always the same — understand the mechanism, check the dose against the research, then decide whether a product is buying you anything.

Four things worth knowing

• A 100 mg 10:1 extract is roughly equivalent to 1,000 mg of raw herb.
• Standardisation to an active compound is more informative than a ratio alone.
• Research doses are usually specified for a standardised extract, not raw powder.
• Products often quote a ratio without stating the standardisation.

What to do about it

1. Convert extract amounts to raw-equivalent before comparing.
2. Prefer products stating a standardisation percentage.
3. Match the form in the research to the form on the label.
4. Be sceptical when neither ratio nor standardisation appears.

None of those cost anything, which is the point. In cognitive health the interventions with the strongest evidence — treating blood pressure and hearing loss, seven hours of sleep, aerobic exercise, staying socially engaged and reviewing sedating medications — are consistently cheaper and far less marketed than the ones with the weakest.

One more framing point. Effect sizes in this field are usually small, and small effects are exactly the ones personal impression cannot detect — especially for cognition, where how sharp you feel tracks last night's sleep more than anything else. A written baseline beats a feeling every time.

The myth to drop

That milligrams are directly comparable across products. Form and standardisation change everything.

For background reading from sources with nothing to sell, see NIH Office of Dietary Supplements — Niacin and NCCIH — dietary and herbal supplements.

Where MemoHoney fits

MemoHoney is a once-daily capsule whose Supplement Facts panel lists seven items: Niacin 7.5 mg NE (47% of the Daily Value), Calcium as calcium carbonate 18 mg, L-Arginine base 200 mg, L-Arginine AKG 2:1 Extract 200 mg, L-Citrulline HCl 100 mg, L-Citrulline Malate 100 mg and Beta-Alanine 40 mg. Every amount is printed, which is more than the two largest pages selling it will tell you.

Read against this topic, the honest placement is as a background nutritional layer rather than a solution. Niacin is delivered at a sensible amount. The amino acids are not: after salt-form conversion the capsule supplies roughly 315 mg of free arginine and 140 mg of free citrulline, against research intakes around 3,000 mg each. And none of the ingredients with human evidence for memory — bacopa, ginkgo, citicoline, Alpha-GPC, phosphatidylserine — appear on the panel at all. It belongs underneath sleep, blood pressure control, hearing checks and exercise, not in place of them. The detail is on the MemoHoney ingredient and dose analysis.

Questions readers ask